CWG 2018

Data check: 4 charts that show the gap between India’s top CWG 2018 performers and the world’s best

Despite many personal bests and national records, India still lags behind the rest of the world.

India claimed 66 medals at the 2018 Commonwealth Games, the third highest tally by the country’s athletes at the quadrennial event and the second highest outside India after Manchester 2006.

Indian athletes consistently bagged medals on each day of the Games. It’s a commendable achievement that many athletes broke Games records and their personal bests. But none of this success has previously translated into medals at bigger international competitions. Despite this new-found bravado, India’s best still lags behind in many events.

To start with, Muhammed Anas Yahiya ran a blistering 400-metre final, falling just short of the podium with a timing of 45.3 seconds, a national record and his personal best. Nearly two years ago, South African Wayde Van Niekerk covered the same distance in 43.03 seconds, more than two seconds faster.

If they ran these times in a simultaneous race, Anas would be over 20 metres behind when Neikerk crosses the finish line. So though he’s the fastest Indian over this distance, he would have snagged an Olympic gold only in 1956.

This is a common story across many events at the Gold Coast. Listed below are a few examples. This doesn’t cover every event that India participated in but those that are decided by timing, weight and distance.

India claimed the silver and bronze in women’s discuss throw with Seema Punia and Navjeet Dhillon respectively. Punia thew 60.14 metres and holds the national record of 64.76.

Both were outclassed by Dani Stevens. The Australian threw the disc 68.26 metres, enough for a silver at Rio.

She was more than eight metres ahead of India’s best ever discus thrower. Punia, a formidable athlete in her own right would need to break her national record by over a metre to be in contention for an Olympic medal at Rio.

Another sport that India was alarmingly successful at the Games was weightlifting. Nine out of India’s 16 lifters won a medal. But India were able to dominate in part because of the absence of Chinese and European lifters. Their consistent success at the Commonwealth Games has never translated into Olympic glory because most of the Indian lifters are dwarfed by their foreign counterparts. India have only won a bronze at the Sydney Olympics largely in part because most can’t lift the same kind of weights.

The exception at Tokyo 2020 could come in the form of Mirabai Chanu. The Manipuri dominated the women’s 48 kg at the Commonwealth Games, lifting 26 kg more than her closest competitor. Her mark would’ve won the silver at Rio. However, there are multiple lifters globally who do lift around the same weight, but Chanu’s progression over the last four years has been nothing short of monumental.

Other Indian lifters didn’t decimate the competition like Chanu did. Most won against lifters from countries with no real weightlifting pedigree.

Like Chanu, 20-year-old Neeraj Chopra’s cannon-like arm could see him in fine company at the next big javelin event.

Chopra clinched gold with a throw of 86.47 meters, easily putting him contention for a bronze at Rio. Although he’s over 10 meters behind the world record, Chopra has a legitimate chance.

His throw was a shade under his personal best of 86.48 metres. Chopra is young enough for multiple chances at the Olympics and world championships. In all likelihood with further training and experience, he’s likely to eclipse his best and give himself a genuine chance to win at bigger events than the Commonwealth Games.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.