FIFA World Cup

Fifa World Cup XI: Pele is captain obvious, but there are a few surprises

Four Brazilians, two Germans, one Englishman, Italian, Argentine, Frenchman and Spaniard each make the World Cup’s best XI.

From the goalkeeping heroics of Gordon Banks to Diego Maradona’s ‘Hand of God’ and ‘O Rei’ Pele, the World Cup has witnessed some of the great individual performances in World Cup history.

Here’s a look at eleven players who lit up the biggest stage in the world:

Gordon Banks (England)

Banks was the goalkeeper when England won the World Cup on home soil in 1966, although he is best remembered for an incredible save, low down to his right, to deny Pele in a group-stage encounter in Mexico 1970. Banks, who spent most of his club career with Leicester City and Stoke City, eventually had to retire from professional football after losing the sight in one eye in a car crash in 1972.

Cafu and Roberto Carlos (Brazil)

Together, these two Brazilians revolutionised the role of the full-back, Cafu on the right and Roberto Carlos on the left. Right-back Cafu, who starred for Roma and AC Milan, played in the Brazil team that won the 1994 World Cup and was captain in 2002, by which time Real Madrid great Roberto Carlos was also part of the side. Both played in the 1998 final defeat against France.

Franz Beckenbauer (Germany)

Known as ‘Der Kaiser’, Beckenbauer was the first great libero, dominating games from the back in his role as a sweeper. The Bayern Munich legend played in the 1966 final, and then famously played with his arm in a sling during West Germany’s defeat against Italy in the 1970 semi-final, the ‘Game of the Century’. But he also lifted the trophy on home soil four years later when West Germany ended the dream of Johan Cruyff and the Dutch, triumphing 2-1 in the final in Munich. He later coached the West Germans to victory over Argentina in the 1990 final.

Fabio Cannavaro (Italy)

The archetypal Italian defender, Cannavaro combined his brilliant positional sense and reading of the game with a nasty side when required. A star with Juventus and Real Madrid amongst others, he captained Italy to glory in 2006, when the Azzurri overcame France on penalties in the final.

Zinedine Zidane (France)

A masterful playmaker, Zidane was arguably the greatest player of his generation. And he left his mark on the World Cup for two very different reasons. He scored twice in France’s 3-0 final win over Brazil as hosts in 1998 and is part of an elite club of players, along with Geoff Hurst, Vava and Pele, to have scored three times in World Cup finals – he also netted a penalty in the 2006 showpiece in Berlin, before later being sent off for an unforgettable headbutt on Italy’s Marco Materazzi in his last game as a professional. Indeed, Zidane is the only player – along with Cameroon’s Rigobert Song – to have been red-carded twice at a World Cup.

Andres Iniesta (Spain)

The Barcelona legend is another glorious playmaker to have graced the World Cup, and to have scored a decisive goal in a final. Iniesta was one of the key members of the Spanish side that won the trophy in South Africa in 2010 – either side of back-to-back European Championships – thanks to their mesmerising ‘tiki-taka’ style. He got the only goal as Spain beat the Netherlands in extra time in Johannesburg. Iniesta has just left Barcelona to continue his club career in Japan, but he is still part of the Spain squad bound for Russia.

Diego Maradona (Argentina)

No single player has dominated a World Cup like Maradona did in 1986, when he led Argentina to glory in Mexico. He scored twice in the quarter-final win over England, his infamous ‘Hand of God’ goal being followed by arguably the greatest individual goal ever scored at a World Cup. A brace in the semi-finals saw off Belgium, before he skippered the ‘Albiceleste’ to their 3-2 win over West Germany in the final. Maradona also helped Argentina all the way to the final in 1990, where they lost to the same opponents. Having first featured at a World Cup in 1982, he bowed out of the tournament in 1994 following a failed drugs test in the United States.

Captain: Pele (Brazil)

Pele, nickamed ‘O Rei’ (The King), is still considered the greatest player of all time, and is the only player to have won three World Cups, having been involved in all of Brazil’s victories in 1958, 1962 and 1970. He missed most of the 1962 tournament due to injury, but he was just 17 when he netted twice in the 5-2 win over hosts Sweden in the 1958 final, while he also scored in the 1970 final victory over Italy. Pele scored four goals in that tournament in Mexico, but he also lit up that competition at other moments, like his dummy of the Uruguayan goalkeeper and an outrageous attempt from his own half against Czechoslovakia that went inches wide.

Miroslav Klose (Germany)

Born in Poland, Klose was never one of the most glamorous names, but he holds the record for the most goals at a World Cup with 16 scored over four tournaments from 2002 to 2014. The ex-Werder Bremen and Bayern striker played in the Germany side that lost 2-0 to Brazil in the 2002 final, was the top scorer when Germany reached the semi-finals as hosts in 2006 and took the record en route to helping his team lift the trophy in Brazil four years ago.

Ronaldo (Brazil)

‘O Fenomeno’ had his ups and downs at World Cup. He was in the Brazil squad as a 17-year-old but didn’t play as they won the 1994 tournament in the USA, while a mysterious fit struck him down just before the 1998 final, although he still played as Brazil lost 3-0 to France. Ronaldo recovered from that and was the top scorer in 2002, scoring both goals in the final win over Germany. He then bowed out of the tournament in 2006, when Brazil lost to France in the quarter-finals.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

The next Industrial Revolution is here – driven by the digitalization of manufacturing processes

Technologies such as Industry 4.0, IoT, robotics and Big Data analytics are transforming the manufacturing industry in a big way.

The manufacturing industry across the world is seeing major changes, driven by globalization and increasing consumer demand. As per a report by the World Economic Forum and Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Ltd on the future of manufacturing, the ability to innovate at a quicker pace will be the major differentiating factor in the success of companies and countries.

This is substantiated by a PWC research which shows that across industries, the most innovative companies in the manufacturing sector grew 38% (2013 - 2016), about 11% year on year, while the least innovative manufacturers posted only a 10% growth over the same period.

Along with innovation in products, the transformation of manufacturing processes will also be essential for companies to remain competitive and maintain their profitability. This is where digital technologies can act as a potential game changer.

The digitalization of the manufacturing industry involves the integration of digital technologies in manufacturing processes across the value chain. Also referred to as Industry 4.0, digitalization is poised to reshape all aspects of the manufacturing industry and is being hailed as the next Industrial Revolution. Integral to Industry 4.0 is the ‘smart factory’, where devices are inter-connected, and processes are streamlined, thus ensuring greater productivity across the value chain, from design and development, to engineering and manufacturing and finally to service and logistics.

Internet of Things (IoT), robotics, artificial intelligence and Big Data analytics are some of the key technologies powering Industry 4.0. According to a report, Industry 4.0 will prompt manufacturers globally to invest $267 billion in technologies like IoT by 2020. Investments in digitalization can lead to excellent returns. Companies that have implemented digitalization solutions have almost halved their manufacturing cycle time through more efficient use of their production lines. With a single line now able to produce more than double the number of product variants as three lines in the conventional model, end to end digitalization has led to an almost 20% jump in productivity.

Digitalization and the Indian manufacturing industry

The Make in India program aims to increase the contribution of the manufacturing industry to the country’s GDP from 16% to 25% by 2022. India’s manufacturing sector could also potentially touch $1 trillion by 2025. However, to achieve these goals and for the industry to reach its potential, it must overcome the several internal and external obstacles that impede its growth. These include competition from other Asian countries, infrastructural deficiencies and lack of skilled manpower.

There is a common sentiment across big manufacturers that India lacks the eco-system for making sophisticated components. According to FICCI’s report on the readiness of Indian manufacturing to adopt advanced manufacturing trends, only 10% of companies have adopted new technologies for manufacturing, while 80% plan to adopt the same by 2020. This indicates a significant gap between the potential and the reality of India’s manufacturing industry.

The ‘Make in India’ vision of positioning India as a global manufacturing hub requires the industry to adopt innovative technologies. Digitalization can give the Indian industry an impetus to deliver products and services that match global standards, thereby getting access to global markets.

The policy, thus far, has received a favourable response as global tech giants have either set up or are in the process of setting up hi-tech manufacturing plants in India. Siemens, for instance, is helping companies in India gain a competitive advantage by integrating industry-specific software applications that optimise performance across the entire value chain.

The Digital Enterprise is Siemens’ solution portfolio for the digitalization of industries. It comprises of powerful software and future-proof automation solutions for industries and companies of all sizes. For the discrete industries, the Digital Enterprise Suite offers software and hardware solutions to seamlessly integrate and digitalize their entire value chain – including suppliers – from product design to service, all based on one data model. The result of this is a perfect digital copy of the value chain: the digital twin. This enables companies to perform simulation, testing, and optimization in a completely virtual environment.

The process industries benefit from Integrated Engineering to Integrated Operations by utilizing a continuous data model of the entire lifecycle of a plant that helps to increase flexibility and efficiency. Both offerings can be easily customized to meet the individual requirements of each sector and company, like specific simulation software for machines or entire plants.

Siemens has identified projects across industries and plans to upgrade these industries by connecting hardware, software and data. This seamless integration of state-of-the-art digital technologies to provide sustainable growth that benefits everyone is what Siemens calls ‘Ingenuity for Life’.

Case studies for technology-led changes

An example of the implementation of digitalization solutions from Siemens can be seen in the case of pharma major Cipla Ltd’s Kurkumbh factory.

Cipla needed a robust and flexible distributed control system to dispense and manage solvents for the manufacture of its APIs (active pharmaceutical ingredients used in many medicines). As part of the project, Siemens partnered with Cipla to install the DCS-SIMATIC PCS 7 control system and migrate from batch manufacturing to continuous manufacturing. By establishing the first ever flow Chemistry based API production system in India, Siemens has helped Cipla in significantly lowering floor space, time, wastage, energy and utility costs. This has also improved safety and product quality.

In yet another example, technology provided by Siemens helped a cement plant maximise its production capacity. Wonder Cement, a greenfield project set up by RK Marbles in Rajasthan, needed an automated system to improve productivity. Siemens’ solution called CEMAT used actual plant data to make precise predictions for quality parameters which were previously manually entered by operators. As a result, production efficiency was increased and operators were also freed up to work on other critical tasks. Additionally, emissions and energy consumption were lowered – a significant achievement for a typically energy intensive cement plant.

In the case of automobile major, Mahindra & Mahindra, Siemens’ involvement involved digitalizing the whole product development system. Siemens has partnered with the manufacturer to provide a holistic solution across the entire value chain, from design and planning to engineering and execution. This includes design and software solutions for Product Lifecycle Management, Siemens Technology for Powertrain (STP) and Integrated Automation. For Powertrain, the solutions include SINUMERIK, SINAMICS, SIMOTICS and SIMATIC controls and drives, besides CNC and PLC-controlled machines linked via the Profinet interface.

The above solutions helped the company puts its entire product lifecycle on a digital platform. This has led to multi-fold benefits – better time optimization, higher productivity, improved vehicle performance and quicker response to market requirements.

Siemens is using its global expertise to guide Indian industries through their digital transformation. With the right technologies in place, India can see a significant improvement in design and engineering, cutting product development time by as much as 30%. Besides, digital technologies driven by ‘Ingenuity for Life’ can help Indian manufacturers achieve energy efficiency and ensure variety and flexibility in their product offerings while maintaining quality.


The above examples of successful implementation of digitalization are just some of the examples of ‘Ingenuity for Life’ in action. To learn more about Siemens’ push to digitalize India’s manufacturing sector, see here.

This article was produced on behalf of Siemens by the marketing team and not by the editorial staff.