Pulwama attack: ORF think tank raps analyst Sushant Sareen for abusive tweet, demands apology
Sareen had made the objectionable comment in response to a tweet put up by writer Gurmehar Kaur in the aftermath of the terror strike.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/650c1/650c12ec7f1dc850bbaf301fb8bac8de73746bbc" alt="Pulwama attack: ORF think tank raps analyst Sushant Sareen for abusive tweet, demands apology"
Senior fellow of the Observer Research Foundation, Sushant Sareen, on Saturday expressed regret for using abusive language on Twitter while responding to a tweet put up by writer and activist Gurmehar Kaur in the aftermath of the Pulwama terror attack.
Sareen, a Pakistan analyst at the foundation, deleted his original tweet after the think tank asked him to issue an apology. “The offending tweet has been deleted,” said Sareen. “I regret my choice of words and should have been more careful in responding/reacting. Although I did not personally target anyone and made a generic comment on a phenomenon, it was apt to be misinterpreted, which I regret.”
The think tank said it “maintains highest standards of conduct including in communication, doesn’t support or condone abusive, intimidatory or hateful language in any form”. The foundation also tagged Raji Pillai, who heads its nuclear and space policy initiative and is a member of its Internal Complaints Committee, in its tweet.
ORF maintains highest standards of conduct including in communication. Doesn’t support or condone abusive, intimidatory or hateful language in any form. On #ICC @raji143 is tagged and heads it. @sushantsareen must delete tweet and apologise.
— ORF (@orfonline) February 16, 2019
The offending tweet has been deleted. I regret my choice of words and should have been more careful in responding/reacting. Although I did not personally target anyone & made a generic comment on a phenomenon, it was apt to be misinterpreted, which I regret. @raji143 @samirsaran https://t.co/P3YkgXW0QX
— sushant sareen (@sushantsareen) February 16, 2019
Observer Research Foundation’s response came within minutes of Sareen’s tweet sparking outrage online. A number of Twitter users called on the think tank to sack the analyst.
“To all those who are posting angry long messages about how revenge is the only answer,” Gurmehar Kaur had tweeted on Friday. “Honestly I understand the anger. We feel it too. But think – the surgical strikes was an reply to another such cowardly attack and we were all told that this was justice. We proved them weak.” She had also warned against a violent reprisal, saying it “doesn’t do anyone justice”.
In response, Sareen wrote: “I guess sex slavery in a jihadi camp is the new millenial fantasy, a thing these brainless idiots crave for.”
Have reported this man to @Twitter. Please join in and get him off the platform. And also off his gig at @orfonline. pic.twitter.com/Ecnlzu2e4g
— Rahul Fernandes (@newspaperwallah) February 16, 2019
Because she has an opinion ( One can disagree with it ) and believes the cycle of Violence should stop and there should be Political Solution - Apparently Sex Slavery in Jihadi camp is her Fantasy pic.twitter.com/nKdaFWPto8
— Joy (@Joydas) February 16, 2019
.@orfonline should require its senior fellows to refrain from trolling young people online with violent sexual reveries. It's not a good look. And it should be examined by their POSHA committee @raji143 @samirsaran
— Raghu Karnad (@rkarnad) February 16, 2019
What a pity and a shame @orfonline @sushantsareen ... is that the only way you could debate this? @mehartweets when they have nothing left to say they try and embarrass you ...never stop ! Personally I feel action is needed but you are fully entitled to your opinion ! Jai Hind https://t.co/ugBjYNSi6Y
— INJESTERS (@rockyandmayur) February 16, 2019
Hey @samirsaran really? Toe curling disgust. Either sack this scum or else hope you do have a POSH committee. I will be writing on this so would appreciate you telling me what action you plan to take.
— Swati Chaturvedi (@bainjal) February 16, 2019