‘Are they ineligible?’ Why no Dalits, minorities on culture panel, Kanimozhi asks Centre
The 16-member committee has been formed to study the origin and evolution of Indian culture dating back to around 12,000 years.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1994/e1994229926b1e6e969a0aca69e177b13e5d79cc" alt="‘Are they ineligible?’ Why no Dalits, minorities on culture panel, Kanimozhi asks Centre"
Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam MP Kanimozhi on Tuesday asked the Centre why it had not included any member of minority communities and Dalits to an expert panel constituted by the government to study the origin and evolution of Indian culture. “Shouldn’t minorities and Dalits talk about Indian culture?” she tweeted. “Or are they ineligible?” The panel does not comprise any women either.
On Monday, Union minister Prahlad Patel had informed Parliament in a written reply that a 16-member committee was looking into the origin and evolution of Indian culture dating back to around 12,000 years, according to PTI. Prahlad said the panel would also explore its “interface with the cultures of the world”.
இந்திய கலாச்சாரம் குறித்து ஆய்வு செய்ய மத்திய அரசு நியமித்துள்ள குழுவில் ஏன் ஒரு சிறுபான்மையினர் கூட இடம்பெறவில்லை ?
— Kanimozhi (கனிமொழி) (@KanimozhiDMK) September 15, 2020
சிறுபான்மையினரோ, தலித்துகளோ, இந்திய கலாச்சாரம் குறித்து பேசக்கூடாதா ? அல்லது அவர்கள் தகுதியற்றவர்களா ? pic.twitter.com/JuM2NtYNUV
The panel’s members include archaeologists KN Dikshit, BR Mani and RS Bisht, and retired judge Mukundakam Sharma. Sharma was also the chairperson of the government’s committee to review sports governance code, according to The Economic Times. The panel does not include any woman.
Besides this, six other members on the panel are professors or academics who specialise in the study of Sanskrit language, and are mostly from Rashtriya Sanskrit Sansthan and Lal Bahadur Shastri Sanskrit University. The panel also includes Makkhan Lal, a controversial historian who was at the forefront of attempts to saffronise history textbooks in the early 2000s and is linked to a Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh-affiliated think-tank.
Several other citizens also criticised the government for not including representatives from South India, the North East, women researchers and experts from other minority communities on the panel.
Acclaimed singer TM Krishna said the committee was proof of the Centre’s “bigoted, casteist, patriarchal nature”. “Culture is where the most damage is being done,” he added. “We are ignoring it at our own peril.”
This committee constituted by the Govt of India to study Indian Culture is proof if its bigoted, casteist, patriarchal nature. Culture is where the most damage is being done. We are ignoring it at our own peril. https://t.co/Jhcz5jKBVg
— T M Krishna (@tmkrishna) September 15, 2020
Here are some other reactions:
See the Surnames, who have been and who are deciding what is Indian Culture.
— Sumeet Blue (@BluePan10159831) September 16, 2020
Brahmins are India and India is Brahmins. Their idea of UP orthodoxy is what they want to project as the entire subcontinent. pic.twitter.com/KCdfVs0fJv
No woman but there is world brahmin association president. Which culture will they write about? https://t.co/jPXTLQOWsI pic.twitter.com/TfM1bwtFsF
— Kavitha Muralidharan (@kavithamurali) September 15, 2020
Brahmins (3% of the Indian population) are representing and studying All-India's culture. No Dalits, No Tribal people, No BCs, No OBCs, No Minorities (Muslims, Christians) included in the panel. Is it Indian culture or Brahminical culture? https://t.co/p14uxQ3JoC
— C.J. Selvamani (@CJSelvamani) September 15, 2020