Entertainment News

Cannes festival shake-up: Red carpet selfies and press premieres canned, Netflix out of competition

The 71st edition of the prestigious festival will be held between May 8 and 19.

Ahead of the Cannes Film Festival’s official selection announcement on April 13, festival director Thierry Fremaux has rolled out a few shake-ups. The 71st edition of the festival, which will be held from May 8-19, will debar selfies on the red carpet and discontinue the practice of morning screenings for the media. Films produced by and streamed on platforms such as Netflix will not be featured in the competition section, reported Variety.

“This rule was established last year,” Fremaux told Variety in an interview about the decision to keep Netflix out of the competition. “It’s now clear: Any film which is selected to compete will have to be released in theaters.” The screening of Bong Joon-ho’s Okja and Noah Baumbach’s The Meyerowitz Stories in the competition created a heated debate last year, with distributors protesting that the decision affected their business.

“Last year, I thought I could convince Netflix but they refused (to release films in theaters),” Fremaux told Variety. “That’s their economic model, and I respect it. But we are all about cinema and we wish to have films that play in competition get released in theaters. That’s the model of film lovers and Netflix must respect it as well.”

The other big shocker is the decision to drop the practice of screening films in the morning for the press ahead of their premieres in the evening. “We had one basic conviction: We would put the gala evenings and red carpet back at the heart of the festival,” Fremaux continued in the interview. “This is how world premieres become again… world premieres.”

Under the new schedule, journalists will be able to see films at the same time as the guests. “The suspense will be total!” Fremaux told Le Film Francais.

As far as the ban on red carpet selfies is concerned, the festival director did not mince words. “Selfies on the red carpet, in a continuous and touristy way, are ridiculous,” Fremaux told Variety. “It tarnishes the quality and tempo of the ascending of the steps... We go to Cannes to see movies, not to take selfies.”

Thierry Frémaux. Image credit: via YouTube.
Thierry Frémaux. Image credit: via YouTube.
Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.