Clean India Campaign

Swachh Bharat: In Rajasthan, a village shows why open defecation is ending only on paper

Dausod in Alwar district was declared free of open defecation in July this year. Today, it has a lot of new toilets but also a host of fresh problems.

Tek Chand Pandit was the oldest among the men sitting under the banyan tree at Dausod’s village square in the late afternoon sun. Dressed in a white kurta pyjama, a gamcha tied around his head, the 50-year-old farmer was walking home to the other end of the village when he stopped to get some rest and to catch up on the conversation.

Meandering from subject to subject, the talk turned to the new toilets in the village. Tek Chand too had got a toilet and a bath constructed on the roof of his house last month.

“It cost me Rs 70,000, but I don’t use it,” said Tek Chand. “I built it so that the women in my family, my wife, daughter-in-law, don’t have to go outside at odd hours. I prefer to defecate in the open.”

Dausod in Alwar district is one of the 237 panchayats in Rajasthan the central government declared as “ODF”, or free from open defecation, in July. When Prime Minister Narendra Modi launched Swachh Bharat Abhiyan on October 2 last year, one of the project’s stated aims was to eliminate open defection by 2019. To measure the progress towards this goal, the government maintains a list of places which have turned “ODF” or open defecation-free, implying that the area’s entire population has access to toilets and is using them regularly instead of defecating in the open.

Rajasthan has been described as the leader of this sanitation revolution. Recently, 70% panchayats in large districts like Bikaner and Churu were declared open defecation-free. On the ground, though, the achievement is mixed. More households than ever have built toilets – but not all these families are using the facilities.

In Dausod, Tek Chand Pandit said he got the new toilet and bathroom built from remittances from his son who lives in Haryana. He said he preferred to defecate in the open a kilometre and a half away from his house.

“I have to walk 1.5 kilometres to be able to feel motion,” smiled Tek Chand, his hand on his belly.

“Why don’t you try walking 750 metres away and then 750 metres towards your house?” quipped Vikram Singh, a retired army man, prompting mirth among the younger men at the village square.

“Baba, do you at least cover it with mud after you are done?”

What qualifies a village as ODF?

Dausod’s villagers have been building toilets under various government programmes for over a decade. The administration first provided government-sponsored latrines here under the central government’s Total Sanitation Campaign in 1999. Years later, Dausod was one of the nine panchayats selected under the United Progressive Alliance government’s sanitation scheme, the Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan, in 2012. And since last year, there has been new toilet construction under the Swachh Bharat mission, which allows any household that does not have a government employee in the family to get Rs 12,000 for toilet construction.

The estimates of toilet coverage in Dausod vary.

Vikram Singh, the retired army man, approximated that around 80% houses today have toilets, whereas a decade back, when he built one, only a quarter of households had them. Navratan Yadav, who was sarpanch till last year and led a toilet construction drive here under the Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan, claimed the coverage is 90%, better than the achievements in Bikaner and Churu.

Sonu Chauhan, the current sarpanch, estimated that toilet coverage in Dausod is lower, at 60% to 70% of all households. “There have been delays in Swachch Bharat funds,” said Chauhan, taking a break from cooking at her home.

Her husband Navrang Chauhan, who administers work in the village on her behalf as the “sarpanch pati”, a practice common in Rajasthan’s villages, said 200 of the families who built toilets did not get reimbursed under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan. “This year, we did not get photographs of new toilets from anyone,” said Navran. He was referring to the requirement for households to submit three photos – of the plinth before toilet construction, the under-construction toilet, and the fully constructed one – before they can get Rs 12,000 reimbursed under Swachh Bharat mission.

A beneficiary has to submit photographs of the toilet at various stages of construction.

Sonu Chauhan, the sarpanch, said a meeting of Dausod villagers with Rajasthan’s Swachh Bharat mission director Swarn Kumar Bunkar and Neemrana block officials on August 28 turned stormy for this reason. “Many villagers complained that the government had not reimbursed funds,” recounted Chauhan. “A number of men got up and said latrine use is not healthy, that they get exercise and fresh air and can go check on their farms when they defecate in the open.”

If the toilet construction in Dausod is not yet complete, why then did the administration categorise it as free from open defecation?

Blame this on statistics, said Manoj Yadav, who acts as the Neemrana block pradhan on behalf of his wife Savita Yadav. “In 2012, under Nirmal Bharat scheme, officials did a survey of households which lacked a toilet,” he said. “In Dausod, 304 families were identified out of total 889 households. By July 2015, all online approvals for building toilets for these 300-odd households were done. So, in the online database, Dausod automatically became an ODF panchayat, free of open defecation.”

Dausod and other panchayats in Rajasthan may have made some gains in eliminating open defecation. But instead of effectively monitoring and encouraging these, the government is conferring ODF status on the basis of online compliance with toilet construction targets of 2012.

If the trend continues, the ODF villages and towns in 2019 will simply reflect administrative units that on paper are compliant with previously set construction targets, not communities that have successfully eliminated open defecation.

In Dausod, block officials have been given instructions that households who have got toilets approved after July, after the panchayat was granted ODF status, will “get payments offline”, explained Manoj Yadav.

Swarn Kumar Bunkar, the director of the state’s Swachh Bharat mission, dismissed this as a minor concern. “This cannot be helped since the total number of beneficiaries will keep increasing as joint families split into nuclear ones.”

Navratan Yadav, the former sarpanch, led a toilet construction drive in 2012 under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan.

High costs of deep pits

Officials concede that they are struggling with not just 100% coverage but also with the technology of toilet construction.

Experts prescribe building two-pits latrines, each pit 4-feet deep and 3-feet wide, in village households. It takes around five years for one pit to fill up. Once the first pit is full, the household can use the second pit while the faecal matter in the first breaks down, turning into manure. On average, a two-pit latrine costs Rs 12,000 to Rs 15,000, which is not a lot more than what the government grants. A proven technology, this has helped eliminate open defecation in most other developing countries.

But almost every household in Dausod is building latrines with single pits which are twice as big – 20 to 40 feet deep and 5 to 7 feet wide – and cost Rs 20,000 to Rs 30,000. They fear that the smaller pits will fill up too quickly. It is the same in the nearby village of Majri Kalan. Costs have also increased because most households that got approvals for toilets decided to build bathrooms as well.

There is yet another reason why villagers are choosing single pits. Till 15 years ago, Dausod had a system of dry latrines which were cleaned manually by dalit communities. With the arrival of flush toilet, the practice ended. But because of the lingering association of latrine cleaning with manual scavenging, wealthier families which constructed toilets first built latrines with large single pits so they can put off emptying them for as long as possible. They now get these cleaned mechanically by tankers with suction pumps that charge Rs 1,300 to Rs 1,800 for the task. The same practice is now being mimicked by poorer households who cannot afford large pits, yet are building them anyway.

“We took Rs 20,000 loan to build a latrine with a 25-feet pit so that it does not fill up. If we build a new latrine, it should last a lifetime,” said Raj Kaur, who works in the National Rural Employment Guarantee scheme. She and her husband have repaid Rs 10,000 of the loan so far.

Though many villagers appreciated the convenience of the new toilets, many families, particularly low income dalit households, confessed to having built them under pressure from the top. “A year back, the sarpanch said this time it is compulsory for you to build a toilet,” said Mukesh Valmiki, a construction worker who spent Rs 40,000 on a toilet and a bathroom after borrowing Rs 20,000 from a local trader. He built the bathroom because of his wife Santosh’s privacy concerns.

Like a majority of the villagers in Dausod, Mukesh Valmiki too got a latrine built with a large 30-feet deep pit. “If it gets filled, I will get it cleaned by the tankers,” he said, pointing to a mobile number painted on several walls nearby for mechanical pit cleaners.

Absence of information 

Nikhil Srivastav, a sanitation researcher with the research institute for compassionate economics (r.i.c.e.), said the bigger pits may be doing more harm than good. “It is like building underground rooms for containing faeces. The government should be cautious to not encourage this in any way,” Srivastav said.

Besides, the problems that open defecation perpetuated are still getting repeated: the tankers that are hired to mechanically empty latrine pits are simply dumping the faecal matter, some of which does not break down underground, on vacant lots near villages.

Swachh Bharat mission wants to change this behaviour by explaining the pros and cons of single pit-versus-two pit technology through an information programme, for which it has allotted 8% of the scheme’s budget. In Rajasthan, this comes to approximately Rs 180 crore of this year’s Rs 2,251 crore outlay.

But in Dausod, panchayat representatives said they have received no additional funds besides what was meant for construction. Alwar district, as it turns out, has spent nothing on providing information and promoting latrine use since April, though it has spent Rs 2.4 crore in this financial year on construction. The sarpanch and the block pradhan said that, under pressure from the district administration to meet targets, they spent their own money on organising meets with villagers and masons to convince everyone to get smaller two-pit latrines.

Incidentally, the first meeting with villagers on two-pit technology took place after August 28, by which time Dausod had already been officially declared open defecation-free. “We showed them photographs to explain how two-pit latrines are cheaper and will work better in the long run. But most families were adamant on building deep single pit-latrines,” said a block official. “We have people defecating in the open, and we have tonnes of faecal matter thrown in one go in the open. Then, what is the point of new construction?”

We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content  BY 

As India turns 70, London School of Economics asks some provocative questions

Is India ready to become a global superpower?

Meaningful changes have always been driven by the right, but inconvenient questions. As India completes 70 years of its sovereign journey, we could do two things – celebrate, pay our token tributes and move on, or take the time to reflect and assess if our course needs correction. The ‘India @ 70: LSE India Summit’, the annual flagship summit of the LSE (London School of Economics) South Asia Centre, is posing some fundamental but complex questions that define our future direction as a nation. Through an honest debate – built on new research, applied knowledge and ground realities – with an eclectic mix of thought leaders and industry stalwarts, this summit hopes to create a thought-provoking discourse.

From how relevant (or irrelevant) is our constitutional framework, to how we can beat the global one-upmanship games, from how sincere are business houses in their social responsibility endeavours to why water is so crucial to our very existence as a strong nation, these are some crucial questions that the event will throw up and face head-on, even as it commemorates the 70th anniversary of India’s independence.

Is it time to re-look at constitution and citizenship in India?

The Constitution of India is fundamental to the country’s identity as a democratic power. But notwithstanding its historical authority, is it perhaps time to examine its relevance? The Constitution was drafted at a time when independent India was still a young entity. So granting overwhelming powers to the government may have helped during the early years. But in the current times, they may prove to be more discriminatory than egalitarian. Our constitution borrowed laws from other countries and continues to retain them, while the origin countries have updated them since then. So, do we need a complete overhaul of the constitution? An expert panel led by Dr Mukulika Banerjee of LSE, including political and economic commentator S Gurumurthy, Madhav Khosla of Columbia University, Niraja Gopal Jayal of JNU, Chintan Chandrachud the author of the book Balanced Constitutionalism and sociologist, legal researcher and Director of Council for Social Development Kalpana Kannabiran will seek answers to this.

Is CSR simply forced philanthropy?

While India pioneered the mandatory minimum CSR spend, has it succeeded in driving impact? Corporate social responsibility has many dynamics at play. Are CSR initiatives mere tokenism for compliance? Despite government guidelines and directives, are CSR activities well-thought out initiatives, which are monitored and measured for impact? The CSR stipulations have also spawned the proliferation of ambiguous NGOs. The session, ‘Does forced philanthropy work – CSR in India?” will raise these questions of intent, ethics and integrity. It will be moderated by Professor Harry Barkema and have industry veterans such as Mukund Rajan (Chairman, Tata Council for Community Initiatives), Onkar S Kanwar (Chairman and CEO, Apollo Tyres), Anu Aga (former Chairman, Thermax) and Rahul Bajaj (Chairman, Bajaj Group) on the panel.

Can India punch above its weight to be considered on par with other super-powers?

At 70, can India mobilize its strengths and galvanize into the role of a serious power player on the global stage? The question is related to the whole new perception of India as a dominant power in South Asia rather than as a Third World country, enabled by our foreign policies, defense strategies and a buoyant economy. The country’s status abroad is key in its emergence as a heavyweight but the foreign service officers’ cadre no longer draws top talent. Is India equipped right for its aspirations? The ‘India Abroad: From Third World to Regional Power’ panel will explore India’s foreign policy with Ashley Tellis, Meera Shankar (Former Foreign Secretary), Kanwal Sibal (Former Foreign Secretary), Jayant Prasad and Rakesh Sood.

Are we under-estimating how critical water is in India’s race ahead?

At no other time has water as a natural resource assumed such a big significance. Studies estimate that by 2025 the country will become ‘water–stressed’. While water has been the bone of contention between states and controlling access to water, a source for political power, has water security received the due attention in economic policies and development plans? Relevant to the central issue of water security is also the issue of ‘virtual water’. Virtual water corresponds to the water content (used) in goods and services, bulk of which is in food grains. Through food grain exports, India is a large virtual net exporter of water. In 2014-15, just through export of rice, India exported 10 trillion litres of virtual water. With India’s water security looking grim, are we making the right economic choices? Acclaimed author and academic from the Institute of Economic Growth, Delhi, Amita Bavisar will moderate the session ‘Does India need virtual water?’

Delve into this rich confluence of ideas and more at the ‘India @ 70: LSE India Summit’, presented by Apollo Tyres in association with the British Council and organized by Teamworks Arts during March 29-31, 2017 at the India Habitat Centre, New Delhi. To catch ‘India @ 70’ live online, register here.

At the venue, you could also visit the Partition Museum. Dedicated to the memory of one of the most conflict-ridden chapters in our country’s history, the museum will exhibit a unique archive of rare photographs, letters, press reports and audio recordings from The Partition Museum, Amritsar.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Teamwork Arts and not by the Scroll editorial team.