Clean India Campaign

Swachh Bharat: In Rajasthan, a village shows why open defecation is ending only on paper

Dausod in Alwar district was declared free of open defecation in July this year. Today, it has a lot of new toilets but also a host of fresh problems.

Tek Chand Pandit was the oldest among the men sitting under the banyan tree at Dausod’s village square in the late afternoon sun. Dressed in a white kurta pyjama, a gamcha tied around his head, the 50-year-old farmer was walking home to the other end of the village when he stopped to get some rest and to catch up on the conversation.

Meandering from subject to subject, the talk turned to the new toilets in the village. Tek Chand too had got a toilet and a bath constructed on the roof of his house last month.

“It cost me Rs 70,000, but I don’t use it,” said Tek Chand. “I built it so that the women in my family, my wife, daughter-in-law, don’t have to go outside at odd hours. I prefer to defecate in the open.”

Dausod in Alwar district is one of the 237 panchayats in Rajasthan the central government declared as “ODF”, or free from open defecation, in July. When Prime Minister Narendra Modi launched Swachh Bharat Abhiyan on October 2 last year, one of the project’s stated aims was to eliminate open defection by 2019. To measure the progress towards this goal, the government maintains a list of places which have turned “ODF” or open defecation-free, implying that the area’s entire population has access to toilets and is using them regularly instead of defecating in the open.

Rajasthan has been described as the leader of this sanitation revolution. Recently, 70% panchayats in large districts like Bikaner and Churu were declared open defecation-free. On the ground, though, the achievement is mixed. More households than ever have built toilets – but not all these families are using the facilities.

In Dausod, Tek Chand Pandit said he got the new toilet and bathroom built from remittances from his son who lives in Haryana. He said he preferred to defecate in the open a kilometre and a half away from his house.

“I have to walk 1.5 kilometres to be able to feel motion,” smiled Tek Chand, his hand on his belly.

“Why don’t you try walking 750 metres away and then 750 metres towards your house?” quipped Vikram Singh, a retired army man, prompting mirth among the younger men at the village square.

“Baba, do you at least cover it with mud after you are done?”

What qualifies a village as ODF?

Dausod’s villagers have been building toilets under various government programmes for over a decade. The administration first provided government-sponsored latrines here under the central government’s Total Sanitation Campaign in 1999. Years later, Dausod was one of the nine panchayats selected under the United Progressive Alliance government’s sanitation scheme, the Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan, in 2012. And since last year, there has been new toilet construction under the Swachh Bharat mission, which allows any household that does not have a government employee in the family to get Rs 12,000 for toilet construction.

The estimates of toilet coverage in Dausod vary.

Vikram Singh, the retired army man, approximated that around 80% houses today have toilets, whereas a decade back, when he built one, only a quarter of households had them. Navratan Yadav, who was sarpanch till last year and led a toilet construction drive here under the Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan, claimed the coverage is 90%, better than the achievements in Bikaner and Churu.

Sonu Chauhan, the current sarpanch, estimated that toilet coverage in Dausod is lower, at 60% to 70% of all households. “There have been delays in Swachch Bharat funds,” said Chauhan, taking a break from cooking at her home.

Her husband Navrang Chauhan, who administers work in the village on her behalf as the “sarpanch pati”, a practice common in Rajasthan’s villages, said 200 of the families who built toilets did not get reimbursed under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan. “This year, we did not get photographs of new toilets from anyone,” said Navran. He was referring to the requirement for households to submit three photos – of the plinth before toilet construction, the under-construction toilet, and the fully constructed one – before they can get Rs 12,000 reimbursed under Swachh Bharat mission.

A beneficiary has to submit photographs of the toilet at various stages of construction.

Sonu Chauhan, the sarpanch, said a meeting of Dausod villagers with Rajasthan’s Swachh Bharat mission director Swarn Kumar Bunkar and Neemrana block officials on August 28 turned stormy for this reason. “Many villagers complained that the government had not reimbursed funds,” recounted Chauhan. “A number of men got up and said latrine use is not healthy, that they get exercise and fresh air and can go check on their farms when they defecate in the open.”

If the toilet construction in Dausod is not yet complete, why then did the administration categorise it as free from open defecation?

Blame this on statistics, said Manoj Yadav, who acts as the Neemrana block pradhan on behalf of his wife Savita Yadav. “In 2012, under Nirmal Bharat scheme, officials did a survey of households which lacked a toilet,” he said. “In Dausod, 304 families were identified out of total 889 households. By July 2015, all online approvals for building toilets for these 300-odd households were done. So, in the online database, Dausod automatically became an ODF panchayat, free of open defecation.”

Dausod and other panchayats in Rajasthan may have made some gains in eliminating open defecation. But instead of effectively monitoring and encouraging these, the government is conferring ODF status on the basis of online compliance with toilet construction targets of 2012.

If the trend continues, the ODF villages and towns in 2019 will simply reflect administrative units that on paper are compliant with previously set construction targets, not communities that have successfully eliminated open defecation.

In Dausod, block officials have been given instructions that households who have got toilets approved after July, after the panchayat was granted ODF status, will “get payments offline”, explained Manoj Yadav.

Swarn Kumar Bunkar, the director of the state’s Swachh Bharat mission, dismissed this as a minor concern. “This cannot be helped since the total number of beneficiaries will keep increasing as joint families split into nuclear ones.”

Navratan Yadav, the former sarpanch, led a toilet construction drive in 2012 under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan.

High costs of deep pits

Officials concede that they are struggling with not just 100% coverage but also with the technology of toilet construction.

Experts prescribe building two-pits latrines, each pit 4-feet deep and 3-feet wide, in village households. It takes around five years for one pit to fill up. Once the first pit is full, the household can use the second pit while the faecal matter in the first breaks down, turning into manure. On average, a two-pit latrine costs Rs 12,000 to Rs 15,000, which is not a lot more than what the government grants. A proven technology, this has helped eliminate open defecation in most other developing countries.

But almost every household in Dausod is building latrines with single pits which are twice as big – 20 to 40 feet deep and 5 to 7 feet wide – and cost Rs 20,000 to Rs 30,000. They fear that the smaller pits will fill up too quickly. It is the same in the nearby village of Majri Kalan. Costs have also increased because most households that got approvals for toilets decided to build bathrooms as well.

There is yet another reason why villagers are choosing single pits. Till 15 years ago, Dausod had a system of dry latrines which were cleaned manually by dalit communities. With the arrival of flush toilet, the practice ended. But because of the lingering association of latrine cleaning with manual scavenging, wealthier families which constructed toilets first built latrines with large single pits so they can put off emptying them for as long as possible. They now get these cleaned mechanically by tankers with suction pumps that charge Rs 1,300 to Rs 1,800 for the task. The same practice is now being mimicked by poorer households who cannot afford large pits, yet are building them anyway.

“We took Rs 20,000 loan to build a latrine with a 25-feet pit so that it does not fill up. If we build a new latrine, it should last a lifetime,” said Raj Kaur, who works in the National Rural Employment Guarantee scheme. She and her husband have repaid Rs 10,000 of the loan so far.

Though many villagers appreciated the convenience of the new toilets, many families, particularly low income dalit households, confessed to having built them under pressure from the top. “A year back, the sarpanch said this time it is compulsory for you to build a toilet,” said Mukesh Valmiki, a construction worker who spent Rs 40,000 on a toilet and a bathroom after borrowing Rs 20,000 from a local trader. He built the bathroom because of his wife Santosh’s privacy concerns.

Like a majority of the villagers in Dausod, Mukesh Valmiki too got a latrine built with a large 30-feet deep pit. “If it gets filled, I will get it cleaned by the tankers,” he said, pointing to a mobile number painted on several walls nearby for mechanical pit cleaners.

Absence of information 

Nikhil Srivastav, a sanitation researcher with the research institute for compassionate economics (r.i.c.e.), said the bigger pits may be doing more harm than good. “It is like building underground rooms for containing faeces. The government should be cautious to not encourage this in any way,” Srivastav said.

Besides, the problems that open defecation perpetuated are still getting repeated: the tankers that are hired to mechanically empty latrine pits are simply dumping the faecal matter, some of which does not break down underground, on vacant lots near villages.

Swachh Bharat mission wants to change this behaviour by explaining the pros and cons of single pit-versus-two pit technology through an information programme, for which it has allotted 8% of the scheme’s budget. In Rajasthan, this comes to approximately Rs 180 crore of this year’s Rs 2,251 crore outlay.

But in Dausod, panchayat representatives said they have received no additional funds besides what was meant for construction. Alwar district, as it turns out, has spent nothing on providing information and promoting latrine use since April, though it has spent Rs 2.4 crore in this financial year on construction. The sarpanch and the block pradhan said that, under pressure from the district administration to meet targets, they spent their own money on organising meets with villagers and masons to convince everyone to get smaller two-pit latrines.

Incidentally, the first meeting with villagers on two-pit technology took place after August 28, by which time Dausod had already been officially declared open defecation-free. “We showed them photographs to explain how two-pit latrines are cheaper and will work better in the long run. But most families were adamant on building deep single pit-latrines,” said a block official. “We have people defecating in the open, and we have tonnes of faecal matter thrown in one go in the open. Then, what is the point of new construction?”

We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Behind the garb of wealth and success, white collar criminals are hiding in plain sight

Understanding the forces that motivate leaders to become fraudsters.

Most con artists are very easy to like; the ones that belong to the corporate society, even more so. The Jordan Belforts of the world are confident, sharp and can smooth-talk their way into convincing people to bend at their will. For years, Harshad Mehta, a practiced con-artist, employed all-of-the-above to earn the sobriquet “big bull” on Dalaal Street. In 1992, the stockbroker used the pump and dump technique, explained later, to falsely inflate the Sensex from 1,194 points to 4,467. It was only after the scam that journalist Sucheta Dalal, acting on a tip-off, broke the story exposing how he fraudulently dipped into the banking system to finance a boom that manipulated the stock market.


In her book ‘The confidence game’, Maria Konnikova observes that con artists are expert storytellers - “When a story is plausible, we often assume it’s true.” Harshad Mehta’s story was an endearing rags-to-riches tale in which an insurance agent turned stockbroker flourished based on his skill and knowledge of the market. For years, he gave hope to marketmen that they too could one day live in a 15,000 sq.ft. posh apartment with a swimming pool in upmarket Worli.

One such marketman was Ketan Parekh who took over Dalaal Street after the arrest of Harshad Mehta. Ketan Parekh kept a low profile and broke character only to celebrate milestones such as reaching Rs. 100 crore in net worth, for which he threw a lavish bash with a star-studded guest-list to show off his wealth and connections. Ketan Parekh, a trainee in Harshad Mehta’s company, used the same infamous pump-and-dump scheme to make his riches. In that, he first used false bank documents to buy high stakes in shares that would inflate the stock prices of certain companies. The rise in stock prices lured in other institutional investors, further increasing the price of the stock. Once the price was high, Ketan dumped these stocks making huge profits and causing the stock market to take a tumble since it was propped up on misleading share prices. Ketan Parekh was later implicated in the 2001 securities scam and is serving a 14-years SEBI ban. The tactics employed by Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parekh were similar, in that they found a loophole in the system and took advantage of it to accumulate an obscene amount of wealth.


Call it greed, addiction or smarts, the 1992 and 2001 Securities Scams, for the first time, revealed the magnitude of white collar crimes in India. To fill the gaps exposed through these scams, the Securities Laws Act 1995 widened SEBI’s jurisdiction and allowed it to regulate depositories, FIIs, venture capital funds and credit-rating agencies. SEBI further received greater autonomy to penalise capital market violations with a fine of Rs 10 lakhs.

Despite an empowered regulatory body, the next white-collar crime struck India’s capital market with a massive blow. In a confession letter, Ramalinga Raju, ex-chairman of Satyam Computers convicted of criminal conspiracy and financial fraud, disclosed that Satyam’s balance sheets were cooked up to show an excess of revenues amounting to Rs. 7,000 crore. This accounting fraud allowed the chairman to keep the share prices of the company high. The deception, once revealed to unsuspecting board members and shareholders, made the company’s stock prices crash, with the investors losing as much as Rs. 14,000 crores. The crash of India’s fourth largest software services company is often likened to the bankruptcy of Enron - both companies achieved dizzying heights but collapsed to the ground taking their shareholders with them. Ramalinga Raju wrote in his letter “it was like riding a tiger, not knowing how to get off without being eaten”, implying that even after the realisation of consequences of the crime, it was impossible for him to rectify it.

It is theorised that white-collar crimes like these are highly rationalised. The motivation for the crime can be linked to the strain theory developed by Robert K Merton who stated that society puts pressure on individuals to achieve socially accepted goals (the importance of money, social status etc.). Not having the means to achieve those goals leads individuals to commit crimes.

Take the case of the executive who spent nine years in McKinsey as managing director and thereafter on the corporate and non-profit boards of Goldman Sachs, Procter & Gamble, American Airlines, and Harvard Business School. Rajat Gupta was a figure of success. Furthermore, his commitment to philanthropy added an additional layer of credibility to his image. He created the American India Foundation which brought in millions of dollars in philanthropic contributions from NRIs to development programs across the country. Rajat Gupta’s descent started during the investigation on Raj Rajaratnam, a Sri-Lankan hedge fund manager accused of insider trading. Convicted for leaking confidential information about Warren Buffet’s sizeable investment plans for Goldman Sachs to Raj Rajaratnam, Rajat Gupta was found guilty of conspiracy and three counts of securities fraud. Safe to say, Mr. Gupta’s philanthropic work did not sway the jury.


The people discussed above have one thing in common - each one of them was well respected and celebrated for their industry prowess and social standing, but got sucked down a path of non-violent crime. The question remains - Why are individuals at successful positions willing to risk it all? The book Why They Do It: Inside the mind of the White-Collar Criminal based on a research by Eugene Soltes reveals a startling insight. Soltes spoke to fifty white collar criminals to understand their motivations behind the crimes. Like most of us, Soltes expected the workings of a calculated and greedy mind behind the crimes, something that could separate them from regular people. However, the results were surprisingly unnerving. According to the research, most of the executives who committed crimes made decisions the way we all do–on the basis of their intuitions and gut feelings. They often didn’t realise the consequences of their action and got caught in the flow of making more money.


The arena of white collar crimes is full of commanding players with large and complex personalities. Billions, starring Damien Lewis and Paul Giamatti, captures the undercurrents of Wall Street and delivers a high-octane ‘ruthless attorney vs wealthy kingpin’ drama. The show looks at the fine line between success and fraud in the stock market. Bobby Axelrod, the hedge fund kingpin, skilfully walks on this fine line like a tightrope walker, making it difficult for Chuck Rhoades, a US attorney, to build a case against him.

If financial drama is your thing, then block your weekend for Billions. You can catch it on Hotstar Premium, a platform that offers a wide collection of popular and Emmy-winning shows such as Game of Thrones, Modern Family and This Is Us, in addition to live sports coverage, and movies. To subscribe, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Hotstar and not by the Scroll editorial team.