The Bitcoin bulls are racing again. A year ago the cryptocurrency was valued at less than $12,000. Now it has passed the symbolic milestone of $60,000, nudging the $63,255 record it reached in mid-April before its price fell to as low as $30,000 in July.
So what is an ETF, and why does this matter to the value of Bitcoin?
How ETFs work
An exchange-traded fund is an investment fund, comprising a pool of assets, traded on a stock exchange. The general attraction is that an ETF offers individual investors the benefits of diversification, protection and liquidity.
Suppose, for example, you want to invest $100,000 in commercial property. You cannot afford to buy an office building or a shopping centre by yourself – and, even if you could, buying just one building would be putting all your eggs in one basket.
Here is where a funds manager with an ETF can help. The manager buys a number of office buildings and shopping centres across a range of locations. Suppose these assets cost $100 million. These are “bundled” into a fund with 1,000 units sold for $100,000 each.
It is like buying a share in a company. It allows you, the investor, to avoid the exposure that comes from buying a single asset. Instead, you get a share of a diversified portfolio.
If the value of the portfolio rises, so does the value of your unit. If you want your money – to liquidate your asset by selling it – this is easy to do because the fund’s units are traded on an exchange.
An ETF is also regulated. This protects you from some of the risks (such as fraud) that come from buying assets directly.
Rather than physical assets (as in our example), many ETFs hold securities such as stocks and bonds or derivatives. These funds can be either passively or actively managed.
Passively managed funds, which are the most prevalent, hold a basket of assets that track the market, or a market segment. An “index fund”, for example, holds shares in proportion to their weight in a stockmarket index such as the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. If a company makes up 5% of the index’s value, the manager will ensure its share makes up 5% of the fund.
Actively managed funds, by contrast, hold more shares whose price the fund manager expects to rise strongly, and fewer or no shares they expect to perform poorly. Whether the return on these funds exceeds those delivered by passive funds depends on whether the fund managers’ judgement (or luck) is better than that of the market as a whole.
A Bitcoin-based ETF is seen as something that will entice more investors to gamble on cryptocurrency.
Buying Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies directly can be fraught. Forget your private key (the equivalent of a password or PIN) and you lose it all. There is no friendly local bank manager who can retrieve or reset a password or make good your loss.
Scams are also on the rise. In the US alone, more than 81,000 cases of fraud were reported in 2020.
So bundling up cryptocurrencies into products overseen by traditional funds managers and regulators can be seen to have advantages, bringing greater respectability to cryptocurrency trading. (So long as you are not bothered by that being the antithesis of the decentralised and distributed ideals that drove techno-libertarians to create cryptocurrencies in the first place.)
Beware another bubble
But while investing in cryptocurrencies through an ETF brings a number of safeguards, it does not reduce the market risk. An indirect gamble is still a gamble.
Indeed an ETF of Bitcoin futures is not even indirect ownership of a pool of Bitcoins. It is a pool of contracts about bets on the future price of the cryptocurrency.
If this sounds a bit like the complicated derivatives known as collateralised debt obligations that led to the Global Financial Crisis in 2008, you would be right. The more complex the financial instruments become, the more dangerous they may be.
One of the few who predicted the collapse of that market was hedge fund manager Michael Burry (portrayed by Christian Bale in the 2015 movie The Big Short). Last week he effectively warned that cryptocurrencies are a speculative bubble. This is a view shared by most economists and business leaders.
As with all bubbles, some will make fortunes, but many will lose. Take care.
John Hawkins is a Senior Lecturer, Canberra School of Politics, Economics and Society and NATSEM at the University of Canberra.
This article first appeared on The Conversation.
Respond to this article with a post
Share your perspective on this article with a post on ScrollStack, and send it to your followers.