publishing trends

In a shock move, HarperCollins India publisher Karthika VK quits after ten years in the job

Conspiracy theories are easy to mount, but the move points to dramatic shifts in the business of publishing books.

The past few years have seen several changes of publishers and editors among India’s English-language publishing companies, but if there was one person who was always considered unshakeable from her post, it was Karthika VK, publisher at HarperCollins India. Which is why her resignation from that post is something of a shock.

The announcement of Karthika’s departure came almost exactly a year after the company got a new CEO in Ananth Padmanabhan, the former head of sales at Penguin India, in October 2015. He replaced PM Sukumar, who left after 11 years at the helm.

Inevitably, the questions have begun: why has Karthika, who joined HarperCollins India in 2006, chosen to quit after all these years? What has changed, forcing her to leave a company that she had become practically synonymous with in the industry and amongst writers, informed readers and the media? Naturally, none of the key players from the company is talking. The official statements, when they come, will be expectedly template-driven.

With Karthika leaving, and her fellow publisher Krishan Chopra – also a 10-year veteran – retiring soon, Padmanabhan will now need to build a top editorial line afresh. Like any CEO, he may well pick people who are aligned to his vision for HarperCollins India.

It’s both easy and tempting to mount conspiracy theories when the publisher of a company leaves after 10 years, a year after a new CEO takes over. That Karthika, in the prime of her career as a publisher – with an extremely enviable track record when it comes to quality fiction, non-fiction, graphic novels and poetry – has chosen to give up her association with HarperCollins clearly points to a divergence in viewpoints.

But the real issue here is not so much a clash between individual perspectives as it is between two approaches to English-language publishing in India. And it isn’t difficult to read into Karthika’s departure the transition of HarperCollins India – don’t forget, it’s part of Rupert Murdoch’s business empire – from one model to another.

An enviable record

Over the past few years, almost no publishing company in India can claim the kind of critical success that HarperCollins has. With the exception of marquee stars like Amitav Ghosh, Ramachandra Guha, Vikram Seth and, now, Arundhati Roy, it has the virtual who’s who of English-language writers – both fiction and non-fiction – from the country. Consider these names, among many others:

Aravind Adiga. Altaf Tyrewala. Amitabha Bagchi. Amruta Patil. Anita Nair. Anuja Chauhan. Annie Zaidi. Arundhathi Subramaniam. Ashok Srinivasan. Bahar Dutt. Boria Majumdar. Chandrahas Choudhury. Gulzar. Hartosh Singh Bal. K Satchinandan. Karthika Nair. Kiran Nagarkar. Keki N Daruwala. Kishalay Bhattacharjee. Kishwar Desai. MJ Akbar. Mahesh Rao. Manu Joseph. Meena Kandasamy. Meghnad Desai. Mridula Koshi. Mukul Kesavan. Nayantara Sehgal. Nilanjana Roy. Pallavi Aiyar. Raghu Karnad. Ritu Menon. Rohini Mohan. Sankarshan Thakur. Sarnath Banerjee. Sudeep Chakravarti. TM Krishna. Upamanyu Chatterjee. Vivek Shanbagh.

At the risk of resembling a roster, even this selective list of the writers whom Karthika has brought into HarperCollins and published shows how powerful the company’s arsenal of writers is. Add to that the energy with which she has published graphic novels and poetry – practically the only publisher to do this on a sustained and regular basis – and piloted some of the finest writing on politics, current affairs and history – and the scale of the company’s achievements on a critical scale become evident. HarperCollins books have also won literary awards on a consistent basis.

What’s more, Karthika is known for the personal relationships of empathy, trust and camaraderie she has with the writers whom she publishes. This is an asset that resides very strongly with an individual rather than a company, and it is something that HarperCollins may well miss in her absence.

Business versus quality

If, despite such a list, HarperCollins has to find other ways to be a successful business, it talks loud and clear about the predicament of publishing in India today. It is almost a tragedy that a steady stream of critically acclaimed, innovative, and award-winning books is not enough for a publishing firm to do well. The ground realities point to a different picture altogether.

With the vast change in the demographics, the overwhelming presence of people below 30 means that reading books is no longer a natural, organic activity – there has to be a reason to read a book. And in this segment, it is campus and corporate romances that rule.

As for non-fiction, the emphasis is on utility, through personal guides and self-help books, in areas like entrepreneurship, personality-development, health, spirituality, food, and beauty, among others. To tap into these veins, a publishing company really has to reinvent itself as a purveyor of information and entertainment, rather than the now old-fashioned notion of producing immersive books that add to our understanding and enjoyment of the world and the human condition.

It’s not difficult to see the pressures the CEO of a publishing company has to operate under. With the average print-run of books down to 3,000 or fewer copies, a company has to produce a great many number of books to reach its targets. And even so, some of them have to be big sellers, and a few, blockbusters. All of which means publishing to the market, following trends, and chasing potential bestselling writers.

And that is the larger picture that Karthika’s exit from HarperCollins throws into relief today. The future of publishing is being created right now. And the old ways of doing things may no longer work for multinational publishers. The change of tack is already evident at Penguin Random House. Now HarperCollins may follow suit.

We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Behind the garb of wealth and success, white collar criminals are hiding in plain sight

Understanding the forces that motivate leaders to become fraudsters.

Most con artists are very easy to like; the ones that belong to the corporate society, even more so. The Jordan Belforts of the world are confident, sharp and can smooth-talk their way into convincing people to bend at their will. For years, Harshad Mehta, a practiced con-artist, employed all-of-the-above to earn the sobriquet “big bull” on Dalaal Street. In 1992, the stockbroker used the pump and dump technique, explained later, to falsely inflate the Sensex from 1,194 points to 4,467. It was only after the scam that journalist Sucheta Dalal, acting on a tip-off, broke the story exposing how he fraudulently dipped into the banking system to finance a boom that manipulated the stock market.


In her book ‘The confidence game’, Maria Konnikova observes that con artists are expert storytellers - “When a story is plausible, we often assume it’s true.” Harshad Mehta’s story was an endearing rags-to-riches tale in which an insurance agent turned stockbroker flourished based on his skill and knowledge of the market. For years, he gave hope to marketmen that they too could one day live in a 15,000 sq.ft. posh apartment with a swimming pool in upmarket Worli.

One such marketman was Ketan Parekh who took over Dalaal Street after the arrest of Harshad Mehta. Ketan Parekh kept a low profile and broke character only to celebrate milestones such as reaching Rs. 100 crore in net worth, for which he threw a lavish bash with a star-studded guest-list to show off his wealth and connections. Ketan Parekh, a trainee in Harshad Mehta’s company, used the same infamous pump-and-dump scheme to make his riches. In that, he first used false bank documents to buy high stakes in shares that would inflate the stock prices of certain companies. The rise in stock prices lured in other institutional investors, further increasing the price of the stock. Once the price was high, Ketan dumped these stocks making huge profits and causing the stock market to take a tumble since it was propped up on misleading share prices. Ketan Parekh was later implicated in the 2001 securities scam and is serving a 14-years SEBI ban. The tactics employed by Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parekh were similar, in that they found a loophole in the system and took advantage of it to accumulate an obscene amount of wealth.


Call it greed, addiction or smarts, the 1992 and 2001 Securities Scams, for the first time, revealed the magnitude of white collar crimes in India. To fill the gaps exposed through these scams, the Securities Laws Act 1995 widened SEBI’s jurisdiction and allowed it to regulate depositories, FIIs, venture capital funds and credit-rating agencies. SEBI further received greater autonomy to penalise capital market violations with a fine of Rs 10 lakhs.

Despite an empowered regulatory body, the next white-collar crime struck India’s capital market with a massive blow. In a confession letter, Ramalinga Raju, ex-chairman of Satyam Computers convicted of criminal conspiracy and financial fraud, disclosed that Satyam’s balance sheets were cooked up to show an excess of revenues amounting to Rs. 7,000 crore. This accounting fraud allowed the chairman to keep the share prices of the company high. The deception, once revealed to unsuspecting board members and shareholders, made the company’s stock prices crash, with the investors losing as much as Rs. 14,000 crores. The crash of India’s fourth largest software services company is often likened to the bankruptcy of Enron - both companies achieved dizzying heights but collapsed to the ground taking their shareholders with them. Ramalinga Raju wrote in his letter “it was like riding a tiger, not knowing how to get off without being eaten”, implying that even after the realisation of consequences of the crime, it was impossible for him to rectify it.

It is theorised that white-collar crimes like these are highly rationalised. The motivation for the crime can be linked to the strain theory developed by Robert K Merton who stated that society puts pressure on individuals to achieve socially accepted goals (the importance of money, social status etc.). Not having the means to achieve those goals leads individuals to commit crimes.

Take the case of the executive who spent nine years in McKinsey as managing director and thereafter on the corporate and non-profit boards of Goldman Sachs, Procter & Gamble, American Airlines, and Harvard Business School. Rajat Gupta was a figure of success. Furthermore, his commitment to philanthropy added an additional layer of credibility to his image. He created the American India Foundation which brought in millions of dollars in philanthropic contributions from NRIs to development programs across the country. Rajat Gupta’s descent started during the investigation on Raj Rajaratnam, a Sri-Lankan hedge fund manager accused of insider trading. Convicted for leaking confidential information about Warren Buffet’s sizeable investment plans for Goldman Sachs to Raj Rajaratnam, Rajat Gupta was found guilty of conspiracy and three counts of securities fraud. Safe to say, Mr. Gupta’s philanthropic work did not sway the jury.


The people discussed above have one thing in common - each one of them was well respected and celebrated for their industry prowess and social standing, but got sucked down a path of non-violent crime. The question remains - Why are individuals at successful positions willing to risk it all? The book Why They Do It: Inside the mind of the White-Collar Criminal based on a research by Eugene Soltes reveals a startling insight. Soltes spoke to fifty white collar criminals to understand their motivations behind the crimes. Like most of us, Soltes expected the workings of a calculated and greedy mind behind the crimes, something that could separate them from regular people. However, the results were surprisingly unnerving. According to the research, most of the executives who committed crimes made decisions the way we all do–on the basis of their intuitions and gut feelings. They often didn’t realise the consequences of their action and got caught in the flow of making more money.


The arena of white collar crimes is full of commanding players with large and complex personalities. Billions, starring Damien Lewis and Paul Giamatti, captures the undercurrents of Wall Street and delivers a high-octane ‘ruthless attorney vs wealthy kingpin’ drama. The show looks at the fine line between success and fraud in the stock market. Bobby Axelrod, the hedge fund kingpin, skilfully walks on this fine line like a tightrope walker, making it difficult for Chuck Rhoades, a US attorney, to build a case against him.

If financial drama is your thing, then block your weekend for Billions. You can catch it on Hotstar Premium, a platform that offers a wide collection of popular and Emmy-winning shows such as Game of Thrones, Modern Family and This Is Us, in addition to live sports coverage, and movies. To subscribe, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Hotstar and not by the Scroll editorial team.