Everyday sexism

TVF case: What are the legal implications of using social media to allege sexual harassment?

More and more women are using social media platforms to speak out against sexual abuse. What are the pros and cons of this strategy?

Over the past few days, a series of sexual harassment allegations against Arunabh Kumar, the founder of the online entertainment site The Viral Fever, has raised a number of questions. Is sexism rife in the new, seemingly-progressive web entertainment companies? Are media start-ups complying with laws on sexual harassment at the workplace? How should companies ideally respond to a woman’s allegations of sexism or molestation?

In the midst of these debates playing out in the media and on social media, another question is just as relevant: what are the legal implications of an allegation of sexual abuse made on social media, and what are the responsibilities of the media while reporting on such unofficial complaints?

The TVF controversy began on social media and has, so far, not moved beyond it. On March 12, an anonymous blog post by a woman claiming to be a former TVF employee alleged that Arunabh Kumar had molested her on several occasions from 2014 to 2016. TVF responded the next day with a post of its own, completely denying all the accusations. By then, however, a slew of other women chimed in on Facebook, with their own posts about alleged sexual harassment they had experienced from Kumar.

So far, none of these women have chosen to file official complaints with the police or the company. But their social media posts have triggered impassioned debates between those who believe the allegations or want a fair investigation, and those who have denounced the accusations as lies or defamation.

To complicate matters, an anonymous Reddit post surfaced on March 14 accusing Rohan Joshi, a comedian from rival web content company All India Bakchod, of sexual harassment. A few hours later, the same person replaced the Reddit post with an apology, stating that the fake accusation had been made only to point out how the anonymous social media allegation against Kumar could not be believed.

Such convenient use – or misuse – of social media raises inevitable questions about the seriouness with which online allegations of sexual harassment should be treated.

‘I wanted to tell my truth’

In the past few years, more and more women have been using Facebook, Twitter and other social media to share their experiences of sexual harassment at the workplace and to call out the perpetrators in public. Part of the reason, predictably, is that women often face hostility and victim-blaming while trying to file police complaints. In the case of harassment at the workplace, taking on a person in a position of power can have real consequences on a woman’s career.

But for many women who speak up online, social media platforms offer catharsis and a sense of sisterhood that help them feel more empowered.

“When I shared my story, I did not expect the kind of positive support I got online,” said Aditi Singh (name changed), one of the many women who used social media to speak out against alleged sexual harassment by photo editor Manik Katyal in November 2015. Even though she received a considerable amount of trolling, Singh believes the sheer number of women who spoke up along with her helped to empower them all. “Sharing the traumatic story with others who had gone through the same gave us some sort of strength that was unprecedented.”

Even though accusations against known personalities like Arunabh Kumar are bound to be reported in the news, the women who make the allegations on social media do not necessarily intend to attract media attention. “All I wanted to do was tell my truth and help other girls be able to tell their truth as well,” said one of the women who put up a Facebook post on March 13 about being sexually harassed by Kumar. “It was really very difficult and scary to speak up, but you have to put your fears aside and create an important precedent.”

Social media posts as complaints

Women also don’t necessarily expect their social media posts about sexual harassment to be taken up as official complaints. “I have tweeted about harassment, at work and even aboard a train, but not because I want to file a complaint,” said Sandhya Ramesh, a science writer who finds social media an open platform that provides comfort and reassurance to women who may find it difficult to speak out alone.

But whether women expect it, can social media accusations be considered actual complaints? The law – the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 – makes no mention of social media in this regard. There have, however, been some precedents.

In 2013, for instance, a law intern’s blog post about being sexually harassed by former Supreme Court judge AK Ganguly was taken up, with her consent, as an official complaint. A three-judge panel was set up to probe her allegations, and after a chain of events, Ganguly was eventually asked to resign from his post as the head of the West Bengal Human Rights Commission.

More recently, Twitter user Naomi Barton had a positive experience with her company when she tweeted about being verbally harassed by a colleague. Her company not only took cognisance of the tweet as a complaint, but also ensured her that it was their responsibility to provide their employees with a safe environment.

Legal guidelines for social media?

These instances of companies taking suo moto cognizance of a social media allegation, however, do not necessarily make social media less problematic.

“The advantage of using social media to make a sexual harassment accusation is that the damage [to the alleged perpetrator] will be immediate,” said Flavia Agnes, a feminist lawyer from Mumbai. “But if you start a process on social media and then don’t follow up the complaints through proper channels, it can be seen as amounting to defamation.”

In 2014, close on the heels of the Justice Ganguly controversy, another law intern filed a complaint of sexual harassment against another Supreme Court judge, Swatanter Kumar. Following the news reports on his case, Justice Kumar sought, and obtained, an order from the Delhi High Court restraining the media from writing about the case. “The law is not clear on whether the same can be applied to social media,” said Agnes.

Without an official complaint to help aid a proper investigation, online allegations can always be dismissed as suspect. “But social media has now become such a large part of our lives, that it is perhaps time for the law to include clear guidelines on how much weightage should or should not be given to online allegations,” said Ashwini Syed, a manager at Safe City, an organisation that conducts workshops on sexual harassment at the workplace for companies.

Irresponsible media

Closely linked to social media, however, is the mainstream media itself. Many women who have spoken about sexual harassment on social media believe that the media is not always sensitive or responsible while reporting these cases.

One of the women who posted Facebook allegations against the TVF founder claims that some news websites did not take her consent before using her photos and name in their reports. “It was really weird to stumble upon articles with my photo everywhere,” said the woman, requesting anonymity.

In cases of social media accusations of sexual harassment, journalist Kalpana Sharma believes the media needs to follow the same rules as with other cases of sexual assault.

“Women may have taken to social media in a fit of passion, or to get their stories off their chest, or they may not be aware of the complications involved,” said Sharma. “But just as with other sexual abuse crimes, here too the media should not go to press with the names of the women.”

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content  BY 

As India turns 70, London School of Economics asks some provocative questions

Is India ready to become a global superpower?

Meaningful changes have always been driven by the right, but inconvenient questions. As India completes 70 years of its sovereign journey, we could do two things – celebrate, pay our token tributes and move on, or take the time to reflect and assess if our course needs correction. The ‘India @ 70: LSE India Summit’, the annual flagship summit of the LSE (London School of Economics) South Asia Centre, is posing some fundamental but complex questions that define our future direction as a nation. Through an honest debate – built on new research, applied knowledge and ground realities – with an eclectic mix of thought leaders and industry stalwarts, this summit hopes to create a thought-provoking discourse.

From how relevant (or irrelevant) is our constitutional framework, to how we can beat the global one-upmanship games, from how sincere are business houses in their social responsibility endeavours to why water is so crucial to our very existence as a strong nation, these are some crucial questions that the event will throw up and face head-on, even as it commemorates the 70th anniversary of India’s independence.

Is it time to re-look at constitution and citizenship in India?

The Constitution of India is fundamental to the country’s identity as a democratic power. But notwithstanding its historical authority, is it perhaps time to examine its relevance? The Constitution was drafted at a time when independent India was still a young entity. So granting overwhelming powers to the government may have helped during the early years. But in the current times, they may prove to be more discriminatory than egalitarian. Our constitution borrowed laws from other countries and continues to retain them, while the origin countries have updated them since then. So, do we need a complete overhaul of the constitution? An expert panel led by Dr Mukulika Banerjee of LSE, including political and economic commentator S Gurumurthy, Madhav Khosla of Columbia University, Niraja Gopal Jayal of JNU, Chintan Chandrachud the author of the book Balanced Constitutionalism and sociologist, legal researcher and Director of Council for Social Development Kalpana Kannabiran will seek answers to this.

Is CSR simply forced philanthropy?

While India pioneered the mandatory minimum CSR spend, has it succeeded in driving impact? Corporate social responsibility has many dynamics at play. Are CSR initiatives mere tokenism for compliance? Despite government guidelines and directives, are CSR activities well-thought out initiatives, which are monitored and measured for impact? The CSR stipulations have also spawned the proliferation of ambiguous NGOs. The session, ‘Does forced philanthropy work – CSR in India?” will raise these questions of intent, ethics and integrity. It will be moderated by Professor Harry Barkema and have industry veterans such as Mukund Rajan (Chairman, Tata Council for Community Initiatives), Onkar S Kanwar (Chairman and CEO, Apollo Tyres), Anu Aga (former Chairman, Thermax) and Rahul Bajaj (Chairman, Bajaj Group) on the panel.

Can India punch above its weight to be considered on par with other super-powers?

At 70, can India mobilize its strengths and galvanize into the role of a serious power player on the global stage? The question is related to the whole new perception of India as a dominant power in South Asia rather than as a Third World country, enabled by our foreign policies, defense strategies and a buoyant economy. The country’s status abroad is key in its emergence as a heavyweight but the foreign service officers’ cadre no longer draws top talent. Is India equipped right for its aspirations? The ‘India Abroad: From Third World to Regional Power’ panel will explore India’s foreign policy with Ashley Tellis, Meera Shankar (Former Foreign Secretary), Kanwal Sibal (Former Foreign Secretary), Jayant Prasad and Rakesh Sood.

Are we under-estimating how critical water is in India’s race ahead?

At no other time has water as a natural resource assumed such a big significance. Studies estimate that by 2025 the country will become ‘water–stressed’. While water has been the bone of contention between states and controlling access to water, a source for political power, has water security received the due attention in economic policies and development plans? Relevant to the central issue of water security is also the issue of ‘virtual water’. Virtual water corresponds to the water content (used) in goods and services, bulk of which is in food grains. Through food grain exports, India is a large virtual net exporter of water. In 2014-15, just through export of rice, India exported 10 trillion litres of virtual water. With India’s water security looking grim, are we making the right economic choices? Acclaimed author and academic from the Institute of Economic Growth, Delhi, Amita Bavisar will moderate the session ‘Does India need virtual water?’

Delve into this rich confluence of ideas and more at the ‘India @ 70: LSE India Summit’, presented by Apollo Tyres in association with the British Council and organized by Teamworks Arts during March 29-31, 2017 at the India Habitat Centre, New Delhi. To catch ‘India @ 70’ live online, register here.

At the venue, you could also visit the Partition Museum. Dedicated to the memory of one of the most conflict-ridden chapters in our country’s history, the museum will exhibit a unique archive of rare photographs, letters, press reports and audio recordings from The Partition Museum, Amritsar.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Teamwork Arts and not by the Scroll editorial team.