Tamil politics

AIADMK factions brace for tough talks as Palaniswami’s narrative of sacrifice irks Panneerselvam

The political drama in the state isn’t yet over.

On December 31, less than a month after the death of All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam chief Jayalalithaa, Revenue Minister RB Udayakumar demanded that her aide, VK Sasikala, be made chief minister in place of O Panneerselvam. By then, Sasikala had become the general secretary of the AIADMK.

“The party and the government should be led by the same person to ensure stability,” he said, initiating weeks of turmoil that led Panneerselvam to rebel against Sasikala after he was forced to resign as chief minister on February 6.

On Wednesday, in what political opponents described as a “clean political somersault”, Udayakumar heaped praise on Panneerselvam. “We all learnt the virtue of loyalty from Panneerselvam,” he said.

The statement came just an hour before party deputy general secretary and Sasikala’s nephew, TTV Dinakaran, decided to step aside from party affairs, bowing down to the majority opinion in the AIADMK.

The period since Jayalalithaa’s death in December has seen a gripping drama playing out in Tamil Nadu. Though Panneerselvam, who took charge after the long-time leader’s death, stepped aside to allow Sasikala to become chief minister, he soon staged a revolt. In the days before Sasikala could prove her majority, more than 120 of the AIADMK’s 135 MLAs were sequestered in a beach resort, ostensibly to ensure that they would not declare allegiance to Panneerselvam. Some of their relatives alleged that they had been abducted by Sasikala’s supporters.

Though Sasikala was unanimously elected the AIADMK’s legislature party leader, before she could take charge as chief minister, the Supreme Court on February 14 upheld her conviction in a disproportionate assets case and sentenced her to four years in jail. Before setting out for prison in Bangalore, Sasikala quickly appointed Edappadi Palaniswami as chief minister and made her nephew TTV Dinakaran. Palaniswami won a trust vote in the state legislature with the support of 121 MLAs to Panneerselvam’s 11.

But the trouble did not end here. On April 9, the Election Commission cancelled the bye-election to fill Chennai’s RK Nagar seat, which had been held by Jayalalithaa, after allegations that voters were being bribed with cash. It fixed blame on the AIADMK (Amma) faction, whose candidate was Sasikala’s nephew, Dinakaran.

As the AIADMK struggled to contain the chaos, negotiations began to unite the party’s various factions.

Drastic changes

Wednesday witnessed the dramatic climax of the developments that rattled the AIADMK over the last six days. With only eight MLAs backing him and majority of ministers wanting his exit, Dinakaran decided to “step aside”.

“I do not have any regrets in leaving the party. I thank all those who supported me,” he said. A meeting of MLAs and party district secretaries Dinakaran had called was cancelled after he realised that it could turn out to be an embarrassment as very few in the party were behind him.

Party officials close to Dinakaran said there were desperate attempts to reach out to MLAs on Tuesday night. The idea was to get the support of enough legislators to ensure that the government won’t survive without Dinakaran’s backing. But even some of the eight MLAs who turned up at Dinakaran’s house on Monday and Tuesday were non-committal on threatening the government. This forced Dinakaran to accept the inevitable.

However, his exit does not mean it would be a smooth sailing for the two factions led by Palaniswamy and Panneerselvam in merging into one unit.

On Wednesday, Udayakumar did not stop with praising Panneerselvam for his loyalty. He suggested that the decision by Chief Minister Palaniswamy to remove Dinakaran was a “supreme sacrifice” for the benefit of the party. This did not go down well with the Panneerselvam faction, which now feels that the strategy of removing Dinakaran could be Palaniswamy’s way of consolidating his position and ensuring that he continues as chief minister.

But some view this as a masterstroke. Since public opinion was against Sasikala family, by getting rid of them, Palaniswamy has assumed the moral high ground. “Here is a chief minister willing to bow down to public opinion. This is how they will try to frame this debate,” an AIADMK MP in Panneerselvam’s team said.

According to the parliamentarian, Palaniswamy has protected his position as chief minister by getting rid of Sasikala family.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, a minister said that the Panneerselvam faction had two primary demands: Get rid of Sasikala and Dinakaran and constitute a judicial inquiry into the death of former Chief Minister Jayalalithaa. The first one has now been fulfilled and there is nothing in the AIADMK to stop Palaniswamy from ordering an investigation.

“Panneerselvam said he was not after chief minister’s chair,” the minister added. “We hope he will honour his word.”

If Panneerselvam insists on becoming chief minister again, Palaniswamy feels it would dent his image among the public and paint him as a power-hungry politician. This could help ensure status quo in the government.

Secondly, it would be difficult for Panneerselvam to demand his appointment as general secretary since he has maintained that the post is an elected one in AIADMK and not a nominated one. This is the central point of his challenge of Sasikala’s elevation in the party before the Election Commission of India. Thus, by kicking out Dinakaran, Palaniswamy’s hold on both the government and the party has become stronger.

Countering BJP

The minister also said that Panneerselvam’s strength was the support he received from the Centre and the Bharatiya Janata Party, which has little presence in Tamil Nadu and is seen to be seeking alternative methods of influencing the state’s politics. The BJP’s main problem, the minister claimed, was Sasikala. “If they try to pressurise us after this, they will end up being exposed,” the leader said.

However, not many are convinced that the BJP will now stop meddling in AIADMK’s affairs. A party Rajya Sabha member said the Income Tax raids against AIADMK functionaries could continue till Panneerselvam manages to take control of the party and government. “But since Dinakaran is out, we now have a better chance of explaining the BJP’s intentions to the people,” the MP said. “They will be more receptive.”

Further, he said if Palaniswamy manages to weather the storm and retain his position, the BJP might be tempted to reach out to him. “Remember, he belongs to the powerful Gounder community,” the MP said. The BJP will not like to make enemies there.”

One more reason to have friendly ties with a strong Palaniswamy is the upcoming presidential elections. The BJP is short of about 35,000 votes. Given the AIADMK’s strength in the Parliament and the state Assembly (it has 49 MPs and 134 MLAs), it could make BJP’s work very easy.

AIADMK officials said the formal talks to merge the two factions could start as early as on Thursday. “We are hoping Sasikala will also resign in the next few days,” the minister added.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Why should inclusion matter to companies?

It's not just about goodwill - inclusivity is a good business decision.

To reach a 50-50 workplace scenario, policies on diversity need to be paired with a culture of inclusiveness. While diversity brings equal representation in meetings, board rooms, promotions and recruitment, inclusivity helps give voice to the people who might otherwise be marginalized or excluded. Inclusion at workplace can be seen in an environment that values diverse opinions, encourages collaboration and invites people to share their ideas and perspectives. As Verna Myers, a renowned diversity advocate, puts it “Diversity is being invited to the party, inclusion is being asked to dance.”

Creating a sense of belonging for everyone is essential for a company’s success. Let’s look at some of the real benefits of a diverse and inclusive workplace:

Better decision making

A whitepaper by Cloverpop, a decision making tool, established a direct link between inclusive decision making and better business performance. The research discovered that teams that followed an inclusive decision-making process made decisions 2X faster with half the meetings and delivered 60% better results. As per Harvard Business School Professor Francesca Gino, this report highlights how diversity and inclusion are practical tools to improve decision making in companies. According to her, changing the composition of decision making teams to include different perspectives can help individuals overcome biases that affect their decisions.

Higher job satisfaction

Employee satisfaction is connected to a workplace environment that values individual ideas and creates a sense of belonging for everyone. A research by Accenture identified 40 factors that influence advancement in the workplace. An empowering work environment where employees have the freedom to be creative, innovative and themselves at work, was identified as a key driver in improving employee advancement to senior levels.


A research by Catalyst.org stated the in India, 62% of innovation is driven by employee perceptions of inclusion. The study included responses from 1,500 employees from Australia, China, Germany, India, Mexico and the United States and showed that employees who feel included are more likely to go above and beyond the call of duty, suggest new and innovative ways of getting work done.

Competitive Advantage

Shirley Engelmeier, author of ‘Inclusion: The New Competitive Business Advantage’, in her interview with Forbes, talks about the new global business normal. She points out that the rapidly changing customer base with different tastes and preferences need to feel represented by brands. An inclusive environment will future-proof the organisation to cater to the new global consumer language and give it a competitive edge.

An inclusive workplace ensures that no individual is disregarded because of their gender, race, disability, age or other social and cultural factors. Accenture has been a leading voice in advocating equal workplace. Having won several accolades including a perfect score on the Human Rights Campaign’s Corporate equality index, Accenture has demonstrated inclusive and diverse practices not only within its organisation but also in business relationships through their Supplier Inclusion and Diversity program.

In a video titled ‘She rises’, Accenture captures the importance of implementing diverse policies and creating an inclusive workplace culture.


To know more about inclusion and diversity, see here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Accenture and not by the Scroll editorial team.