Adil Rashid on Sunday became just the 14th player and first Englishman in 13 years to complete a Test match without bowling, batting, taking a catch or effecting a run out.
Rashid, who made £12,500 ($15,960, 13,977 euros) for his walk on role, was not called upon to weave his leg-spin magic in England’s innings and 159-run win over India in the second Test at Lord’s.
With the overcast conditions in both of India’s innings ideal for swing bowling, Rashid was almost as much of a spectator as any member of the crowd at ‘the home of cricket’ as the tourists were dismissed for 107 and 130, with James Anderson, England’s all-time leading Test wicket-taker, returning match figures of nine for 43.
And when England batted, Rashid was still waiting as next man in when skipper Joe Root declared the home side’s lone innings on 396/7.
Adil Rashid is first England player in 13 years to play a Test without getting to bat, without getting to bowl and without taking a catch.
— Mazher Arshad (@MazherArshad) August 12, 2018
Last was Gareth Batty against Bangladesh, also at Lord's, in 2005. #EngvInd
With Rashid not a member of England’s slip cordon, chances were unlikely to come his way either during his 12th Test.
Rashid’s ‘achievement’ was far from unique in the 141-year history of Test cricket, with 13 previous instances of players having equally quiet games.
The last time it happened to an England cricketer was when off-spinner Gareth Batty was not called upon in an innings and 261-run hammering of Bangladesh at Lord’s in 2005.
The irony was that Ed Smith, England’s new national selector, found himself involved in a huge row with Yorkshire, the bowler’s county, when he recalled Rashid to the Test squad ahead of the series opener at Edgbaston.
Yorkshire were furious because Rashid, 30, had signed a white-ball only county contract that meant he was only available to play limited-overs matches for them.
Rashid at least made scores of 13 and 16 at Edgbaston, while taking three for 40 in a match that England won by 31 runs.
Of course, this ‘feat’ didn’t go unnoticed on Twitter. There were plenty of jokes doing the rounds, given this strange turn of events after Rashid was included in the Playing XI for this series out of the blue.
Adil Rashid did not bowl or bat in that England victory. Remarkable commitment to not playing red-ball cricket #EngvInd
— Liam Blackburn (@liamblackburn) August 12, 2018
Well played England. Tricky man of the match. My money is on Adil Rashid.
— mike selvey (@selvecricket) August 12, 2018
Adil Rashid is yet to bowl, yet to bat, and has touched the ball just 25 times in the field. #ENGvIND
— The Cricket Prof. (@CricProf) August 12, 2018
Touch number 26 for Adil Rashid #TFC
— Vithushan Ehantharajah (@Vitu_E) August 12, 2018
With AFP inputs